How to Ace GMAT AWA: 5 Essential Tips
Step 1: Identify logical flaws in the prompt
Spend the first 3 minutes reading the prompt specifically to find logical gaps. Do not look for factual errors; look for errors in reasoning. Common GMAT flaws include confusing correlation with causation, making false analogies, or relying on unrepresentative statistics. Look for keywords like 'because,' 'therefore,' or 'since' to find where the author attempts to link evidence to a conclusion. If an author suggests that a decrease in sales at one store means the entire brand is failing, they are making a hasty generalization. Note at least three of these flaws before you begin typing.
Step 2: Structure your response with a template
Standardize your essay structure to save time. A high-scoring GMAT AWA essay follows a predictable four-paragraph format. Start with an introduction that restates the argument's conclusion and identifies it as flawed. Follow this with two body paragraphs, each focusing on one major logical fallacy. In these paragraphs, explain why the logic fails and what additional information would be needed to validate the claim. End with a conclusion that summarizes why the argument is currently unpersuasive and what steps the author should take to fix the logical gaps.
Step 3: Use strong transition words for flow
The GMAT grading algorithm and human readers both look for structural signposts. Use transition words to show the relationship between your points. Start body paragraphs with phrases like 'First and foremost' or 'Furthermore'. When introducing a counter-argument or a flaw, use 'However' or 'Conversely'. When explaining the result of a logical error, use 'Consequently' or 'Therefore'. These words ensure the reader can follow your critique without effort, which is a key requirement for a top-tier score in the 'Organization and Development' category of the rubric.
Example: Critiquing a GMAT Argument
PROMPT: "Last year, Olympic Foods introduced a new line of frozen dinners. Since then, profits have increased by 20%. Therefore, the new line is the primary driver of the company's success." CRITIQUE EXCERPT: 1. [Identify Conclusion]: The author concludes that the new frozen dinners caused the 20% profit increase. 2. [Point Out Flaw]: This argument commits the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, assuming that because the profit increase happened after the product launch, the launch caused the increase. 3. [Provide Counter-Example]: The author fails to account for other variables, such as a general industry upturn or cost-cutting measures in other departments. 4. [Suggest Improvement]: To strengthen the argument, the author must provide data comparing the frozen dinner revenue specifically to other revenue streams during the same period.
Step 4: Suggest specific improvements
A critical part of the GMAT AWA is not just pointing out what is wrong, but explaining how to make it right. For every flaw you identify, provide a concrete recommendation. If the prompt relies on a vague survey, suggest that the author provide the sample size and demographics of the respondents. If the prompt assumes a trend will continue indefinitely, suggest that the author provide evidence of market stability. Providing these solutions demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking and moves your essay from a simple summary to a sophisticated analysis.
Step 5: Proofread for sentence variety
Reserve the final 2 minutes for a quick review. The GMAT AWA evaluates syntactic variety. If you notice multiple sentences in a row starting with 'The author says,' combine them or change the structure. Use complex sentence structures by incorporating subordinate clauses. For example, instead of writing 'The argument is weak. It lacks evidence,' write 'Because the argument lacks empirical evidence, it remains fundamentally unpersuasive.' Check for common typos, but do not obsess over minor spelling errors, as the graders prioritize logical clarity over perfect mechanics.
Common GMAT AWA Mistakes to Avoid
- Expressing a personal opinion: Never state whether you agree with the author's conclusion. Only critique the logic used to reach it.
- Writing too little: Essays under 300 words rarely provide enough depth to score above a 4.0. Aim for 400+ words.
- Attacking the facts: Accept the premises as given, but attack the way those premises are used to support the conclusion.
- Ignoring the prompt's instructions: Ensure you specifically 'analyze the line of reasoning' as requested, rather than just summarizing the text.
Related guides
Exam and AP Prep
How to Master Timed Essay Writing Strategies
6 min read
Exam and AP Prep
How to Outline a Timed Essay: A 5-Minute Strategy
4 min
Exam and AP Prep
GRE Argument Essay Logical Fallacies List
4 min read
Exam and AP Prep
How to Proofread an Essay in 5 Minutes
4 min
Exam and AP Prep
How to Annotate a Prompt Quickly
4 min