Skip to main content

How to Write a Literature Review

How-to6 min·Updated May 2024

Overview

A literature review is a systematic survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. You will learn how to search for relevant research, evaluate source credibility, and synthesize findings into a cohesive argument. The process involves five key steps: defining your scope, searching databases, identifying themes, outlining your structure, and writing the synthesis.

Step 1: Define your research scope

Define the boundaries of your research before you begin searching. A literature review is not a list of everything ever written on a topic; it is a curated selection of the most relevant work. Start by turning your topic into a specific research question. For example, instead of 'climate change,' focus on 'the impact of rising sea levels on coastal real estate values in Florida.' This narrow focus allows you to filter out thousands of irrelevant papers and ensures your review remains manageable and focused.

Step 2: Search and evaluate sources

Use academic databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, or JSTOR to find sources. Use Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to refine your results. Once you have a list of potential sources, evaluate them using the CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose). Prioritize peer-reviewed articles and seminal works that are frequently cited by other researchers. Look at the reference lists of your initial sources to find additional 'must-read' papers in the field.

Step 3: Identify themes, debates, and gaps

As you read, look for patterns across the literature. Do most authors agree on a specific theory? Is there a major conflict or debate between two schools of thought? Identifying a research gap is the most critical part of this step - find what is missing or under-researched in the current literature. This gap provides the justification for your own research. Take organized notes that categorize sources by these themes rather than just by author name.

Step 4: Outline your structure

Choose an organizational strategy that best fits your topic. A thematic structure is most common, where you organize paragraphs around specific concepts. A chronological structure works well if you are tracing the evolution of a theory over time. A methodological structure is appropriate if you are comparing different research methods (e.g., qualitative vs. quantitative studies). Ensure your outline includes an introduction that establishes the context and a conclusion that summarizes the state of the field.

Step 5: Write using synthesis

Write your review by synthesizing sources. This means your paragraphs should be organized by ideas, not by individual papers. Instead of saying 'Smith says X' in one paragraph and 'Jones says Y' in the next, group them together. Use transition words to show relationships: 'While Smith (2020) argues for X, Jones (2021) suggests Y, indicating a growing shift toward Z.' Your goal is to tell a story about the current state of knowledge in your field.

Example of Synthesis vs. Summary

Example
### Poor Example (Summary List)
Smith (2019) found that remote work increases productivity. Jones (2020) argued that remote work leads to burnout. Brown (2021) studied how home office setups affect focus.

### Strong Example (Synthesis)
Recent scholarship presents conflicting views on the efficacy of remote work. While some data suggests a rise in individual output (Smith, 2019), others highlight the long-term risk of employee burnout (Jones, 2020). A critical factor mediating these outcomes appears to be the physical environment of the home office (Brown, 2021), a variable often overlooked in earlier productivity studies.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Summarizing instead of synthesizing: Do not simply list what each author said; explain how their ideas relate to one another.
  • Including outdated sources: Unless you are writing a historical review, avoid using sources older than 5-10 years unless they are seminal works.
  • Ignoring the 'gap': A literature review that only describes what is known without identifying what is unknown fails to provide a purpose for new research.
  • Over-quoting: Use paraphrasing to demonstrate your understanding. Use direct quotes only when the original phrasing is unique or essential.

Write your essay with EssayGenius

AI-powered drafting with verified sources and proper citations.